What if germany won ww2

But they also intended to eliminate Christianity and to adopt a state policy of polygamy so that the male survivors of wars expected to kill four million German soldiers would be able to impregnate enough German women to forestall a drop in population.

Hitler plainly saw his principal allies, Italy and Japan, as partners of convenience. As a fascist state, Italy might be permitted its new empire on a permanent basis, but Japan, after doing the dirty work of conquering China, the eastern half of the Soviet Union, southeast Asia, Australasia, and the central Pacific, would eventually be conquered in turn—though only after the destruction of the United States, the last great power free of Axis control.

Weinberg discerned only the vaguest German plans for how it intended to deal with this last problem, the elimination of the United States. As late as the autumn of , Hitler continued to see the British as his most dangerous adversary in the West, notwithstanding the fact that by then the United States was contributing not only the most manpower in the European Theater of Operations but also the most tanks, aircraft, and artillery.

Indeed, by that point American military aid was propping up the war efforts of every nation fighting the Axis powers. Hitler assumed that the Japanese would obligingly remain at war with China and the United States until he could gobble up his erstwhile allies. Yet Imperial Japan clearly understood that its partnership with Nazi Germany was temporary, especially given the virulent racism on which Nazism rested.

And history is replete with reversals of alliance in the face of new circumstances. Axis Victory in Europe would have meant that the Japanese forces fighting in Asia and the Pacific would have got a clear advantage over the USA and the allies. Moreover, as the British Empire was the largest at the time and held nearly one fourth or a quarter of the world under its dominion, the surrender of the mainland Britain would have eventually driven the territories held by Britain to surrender to Germany as well because, without the support, administration and the management aid from Britain, the colonies would have not lasted long on their own.

At its highest expansion during the second world war, Nazi Germany was stretched a staggering 3. Almost all the states in Eastern Europe were either allies or the puppet states of Nazi Germany. We have mentioned almost everything that could have happened if the Nazis won the war. So, here is a brief summary of the political and ideological changes that would have happened.

In a world under Nazis, the latest technologies like these would have been improved to an even more advanced level and would have used to apply to achieve destructive military purposes. The following is an imaginary, fictional map of how the world could have been if the Axis victory was ensured in the second world war. However, allies, especially the USA and Russia shifted much of their resources to wartime production much earlier, giving them a clear advantage over the Nazis.

However, there are clearly several strategic mistakes Hitler and the Nazis made that if prevented, could have given them the upper hand of the war. They are,. To summarize, the Nazis could have won, if they did not make many strategical mistakes and had war from all fronts. But still, it would have been extremely difficult as economic, resource and military conditions at the time were strictly against them.

Het e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd. You are free to use our maps, all we ask is you include a link back to TonyMappedIt. Courtesy of the United States Military Academy, Department of History After almost 6 years since the beginning and after countless deaths of both soldiers and civilians, the European front of the war ended in with the surrender of the Nazis and the suicide of Adolf Hitler.

No more democracy : The world would have been under a totalitarian rule where freedom of speech, media freedom and human rights are disregarded. Discrimination based on ethnicity, nationality, and race would have been plenty under the Axis rule.

I was talking about civilizations. Much of the rest of what you say is true, except that bonobos split off from chimps after the line that led to humans did, so it terms of relatedness they are equally related to us as chimps are. I mean, I was pretty sure slavery ended more than a hundred years ago, but hey, I guess their poor little grandchildren still have nightmares.

Grow up. The blacks, Native Americans, and Japanese still faired better in America in the s than many groups did in Germany or the Soviet Union at that time. They are the same except for their forms of who should rule. Someone is considered a terrorist when the use of force and violence against a person or property is used to intimidate a government, the civilian population, or any segment, in furtherance of political or social objectives.

And as a Hindu I can say this as my nation is completely against them. It is also state in their version of the Holy Bible. What I am attempting to address is not all are terrorists and the ones who are, do it under the misunderstanding of peace.

The biggest genocide in human history? We forget the genocide of millions of Africans during the slave trade. Can we stop arguing about whose the worst of them all? He murdered millions and millions of innocent people Holodomor alone accounts for millions deaths l, annexed several eastern European countries and murdered some more people, attempted to invade my country Finland which no doubt would have led to significant portion of the population sent to Siberia.

Stallin slew 30 million of his own people, now, then established a gulag system of concentration camps that ran for over 40 years. The worst crimes in human history were conducted during socialist and communist regimes. Get your facts right! The Soviets killed people for what were essentially pragmatic reasons.

To me, that is far more heinous, even if the number is smaller. Stalin killed due to his paranoia around him. He starved millions. Pragmatic to him I guess. Paranoid pragmatism is not a good rational, as it was for ideology, Stalins ideology. You are sick man. Get some help. And you are dead wrong…Stalin and his soviets murdered millions even before WWII started…and they did it for things as small as having an education or having a nice house. Read a book sometime, if you are able. Murder was the very essence of Nazi Germany.

Look at what happened to Native American. It makes the Holocaust look like insonmia Native Americans probably are gonna be messed up for another century. Look at African-Americans. Slavery ended years ago and we are still messed up from it. In my opinion, worse, albeit on a smaller scale and time; look at what some Japanese did to China around World War II time.

A psychopath would be disturbed by it They get kids and used them to practice shooting and stabbing. They kill people for entertainment… They were just doing evil to a degree that questions their humanity. Nazi:Bad:killing millions for no reason and enslavement and religionist Good:saving the Islamic nations from enslavement of allies and making the Islamic nations.

Slavery had been illegal in Britain for well-over a hundred years, before then. Slavery had been banned definitively in the UK since It was still permitted in the overseas territories until later, but not Britain itself. Germany fight against Britain loosened is colonial hold on Africa. That was a positive development for Africa which hastened the independence of many African nations. That is one way to look at it.

The only way is that after the British and other European abandoned Africa, there were numerous civil wars and messed up economies. They did not plan a smooth transition, they went from different tribes piled together under countries, to independent countries with the largest tribe dominating.

Are you stupid or something? Germany liquidated and shot like over 6 million jews! The Russians took revenge on how the Nazis did there people, when the Germans first invaded Russia.

Stop being stupid! Funny you say that — Its somewhat you who are being stuped, not knowing history and shit. Like US starved a mil germans to death! With help of the british,and the only reason the british did not use gass on the german civilians was becourse the germans had done the same the other way.. Thats right nigga its time to criticize you get rekt in this world every country is murderer. You never hear Americans call these colonist evil nor give compensation to the degree Jewish people got from post-Nazi Germany.

Because the colonist won the war and wrote the history that is in your head. Try again apologist. Europe was conducting pogroms against the Jews long before the New World was discovered.

Uh no…they based it on how the Turks dealt with the Armenians and Greeks. Read you history. I dont have proof but these books are thousands of years old and the number of these books is unimaginable…..

The whole thing is the secret Vatican library with more info on people in history than we will ever know. The fact that U. They are the ones that committed the worst crimes during the war. Hiroshima and Nagasaki anyone???

Actually the atomic bombs that ended World War II in the Pacific probably saved more lives than they took. If the US had had to invade Japan, it would have been a blood bath.

Far more Japanese are alive today because of the atomic bombs dropping and ending the war than would have been had the bombs not been dropped. I was about to say that. The Japs thought that surrounding would kill their emperor either through suicide or death penalty. Also btw what did the Russians do to end the war with Japan? Sorry for grammar! LOL the worst crimes committed during the war was what Japan did to China. Nanjing anyone??? Capricorn, you are a moron.

Try actually thinking sometime. The fanatical Japs made it clear that they were not going to surrender without an invasion. It was estimated that an invasion would have cost the Allies a quarter million deaths, and over a million Japanese dead. Look at the death tolls of Japanese from relatively most invasions like Iwo or Saipan.

Try reading a book about the war sometime before spewing Eurotrash propaganda. Fair point, however, Hiroshima and Nagasaki were a lesser evil. It is projected that fatalities would have been much higher as the Japanese at this time, and still are, to an extent, some of the most tenacious people on earth.

For example, such forms of ritual suicide are common today and socially acceptable in Japan to protect honor and standing. Also, we tried to warn them. LeMay leaflets, anyone? However, to let it sink in, this was not morally correct, however, the alternative would likely have been a far bloodier and longer war. However, the neat thing about humanity is that we can learn from these political mistakes. This is why fascism and totalitarianism has a bad rap to this day. For example, how do you think the North Koreans would act when they see a place like the US, Britain or the rest of Asia.

This specific country is told by the Kim family that they the Kim family are gods and that the rest of the world is even worse off than they are. Communism and Fascism yes, socialism in all forms belongs here too are the real problems, as they are are extremist systems that have to eliminate dissenters just to stay afloat. Not to mention the disastrous effects on the economy. You must be a kid. War is evil and you must be evil to win.

It is the guy that won the war. He is the one that writes history and will naturally make himself look good and the loser bad. If Hitler won, we would say he has virtue and Allied were evil.

Since he lost we say Hitler is evil and Allied are good people. It is life. The Nazis were…that alone makes them the bad guys. Germany was trying to invade them. And your argument might be that people decide whether or not someone is evil by their own opinion. If you see a child being starved to near death would you believe that the parents are evil? Yes you would because they had a responsibility to feed them and they intentionally tortured a little child by not giving them food.

Nazis and Japanese could have world war 2 main mistake made by Japs is attack on pearl harbour which made to fight with united states the mistake made by Nazis is they created two way he should have completed invasion against the Britain he should not have been canceled the invasion.

This way you have the oil and you can avoid the winter which also led to the Nazi defeat. But to answer the question; Yes Germany absolutely could have won. Tell Japan to not invade America until Europe is dominated first 2. Save the Final Solution until after the war 3. Defeat Russia with Japan 7. Bomb Japan into submission 8. Nice list. Japan does not bomb Pearl Harbor. Skip the Final Solution entirely. The British Empire is on the ropes at this time.

Churchill will fail a vote of no confidence in Parliament. Britain capitulates under the new Labour leadership. Britain is nothing without the Empire. Leave the U. There is no U. Defeat Russia with Japan! At least discourage Japan from signing a non-aggression pact with Russia.

The stupidest thing the Axis allowed was to have Japan bring the U. No coordination! Why bomb Japan? Is half of the world under German domination not enough?

Easier said then done. It was hard then to bomb America, given its distance from Europe. Japan was fortunate and never really keyword got a good second chance to bomb it. Plus, America has a lot of natural resources and mind-power. America was probably the second strongest country next to Germany able to take on the rest of the planet. Germany and its new allies would have a tough fight. Russia and other country would be hesitant to join Germany bent on world domination.

Leaders want more power and not less- and certainly not to Hitler. On top, America would of had played on that and it did. A reason why Japan attacked Pearl Harbor is because America was aiding its enemies.

Japan attacked the U. A because we embargoed the hell out of them. They had no oil and no food. This attack worked because of sheer luck. The radars towers did pick them up, but they thought they were allied transport planes and the times matched up the real transport planes came during the attack and were shot by friendly fire. The ships were being cleaned out and had maintenance — all the windows, hatches and doors were all left open so they all sunk easier than normal when attacked.

Moreover, the resource and manpower question, together with diminishing returns as regards mobilization and the incredible size disparity, makes it harder still. No Operation Sea Lion success. This one sticks though. Berlin steps up efforts to consolidate integration of continental Europe particularly central Europe, always at the core of long term planning — Schacht plan, etc — utilizing the enormous human capital resources and economic complementarities. It gains from this enforced period of stability in a medium term — year Cold War context, see Erfurt and the post-war German boom for further evidence as to feasibility to develop the economic and technological resources along with enormous manpower which can ultimately bring down the USSR, with the tacit acquiescence of the USA which had defeated Japan and ending in a Brezhnev style stagnation or nuclear war.

The challenger to liberal democracy was always going to be Fascism or Communism, no one knew which one though — it was a close run thing. Hitler could have won if he: 1 United the Islamic nations into the Islamic empire again as quick as possible instead of making the kingdoms,sultanates,and republics after he freed them and giving them to Turkey Ottomans so they can rebuild the empire and get the once 2nd largest empire to his side 2 He could have invaded his enemies separately other than attacking everyone in the same time 3 He could have helped his new lands Poland,France,Scandinavia,etc.

The for reading!!!!!!!! YouTube:ahmed real there are two accounts Wanna share this share it with the username ahmed real The again. Hitler could have won the war with better public relations. Yeah, he needed Spartans whose shields can stop bullets, tanks and nuclear bombs. Greece was probably what he admired, but it was irrelevant to world conquest. Not really. It is hard to get conquered people to join you takes a long time and some brainwashing.

When Britain was about to seize Jamaica from Spain, Spain asked the Natives to join the fight and promised them benefits. The Natives ran into the caves at the first chance they got and left the Spaniards alone to taste English lead and swords.

It is hard to conquered a piece of land and then rest and try to conquered more. If you do that, the potentially-conquerable people would wise-up and get better prepared. Plus, it was not of much value during the war hard to defend given its isolation. Arabic nations were immaterial during World War II. They were dirt poor pun intended and had no resources oil boom came later. German military was stretched thin. It could not really added more defense or things like that. It tried to do too much and own too much.

Well Germany did cut-off Britain from the empire? Black-outs were imposed because of bombing raids. Hitler believed Britain could be persuaded and could be made an ally, but he got that all wrong. In fact, he has pictures of some of the atrocities committed that were taken by his regimental photographer with him in the photos, so tell me how that could be faked in the s?? WW2 is one of the only wars in history where you can clearly point to a good side and an evil side.

The bombing of Dresden and nuking of Japan were both necessary actions, the point was to send a clear message that the actions of Germany and Japan would not be tolerated ever again.

Looking at Japan now, it appears to have worked. Furthermore the bombing of Dresden was done deliberately in the line of Soviet advance to send them the same message. Whether technically war crimes or not, they were necessary and done for a reason, not on a whim or out of spite, and not comparable to genocide.

Bombing specific railway lines was extremely difficult in WW2 and would not have stopped the holocaust in any meaningful way. If you truly believe that the Allies and Germans were comparably wicked I have to ask, have you ever actually studied any of this, or are you just reciting BS pro-nazi propaganda? Losses under the British empire, a lot. Wantet to give a full answar — yes I know very well what the nazies did.. Typical neo-Nazi bullshit.

Your side lost-and all decent people including most present day Germans-think that was a good thing. Hitler could have won? Would he have united Europe and the US against Communism and listeded to his Generals, he would have won the war! People really over-estimate the effectiveness of the U-boats, sure they were extremely powerful at the start of the war and took a heavy toll on supply lines, but by the middle and end of the war they were little more than death traps because we learned how to deal with them, and they were made even more obsolete after we cracked enigma.

This biggest butchers perhaps of all times? China and the United States. The U. Be careful when you judge preborn children to be not human. You think they really would have a pretty good shot at winning, right?

Now go shake your fist at your pictures of Emmanuel Goldstein… or Hitler or whoever. Salute your pictures of Roosevelt… or Stalin or whoever. You know the truth. Done then there will be a civil war and all countries freed theirselves with about countries starting a death match they created new kind of weapons there is peace for a long time but the fire nation attacked and everything changes. I can only see Hitler winning the WW2 in one way.