How many words plagiarism

I remember the words, "the odds of 16 words in a row is But I will never forget the "16 word rule. Either way, 1 in 5 just does not seem like they are considering the numbers that they are actually talking about.

Or, it's simply some sort of flag, which would be irrelevant by itself considering every assignment handed in will incidentally fall into this category.

NICE topic. Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Learn more. What exactly is the "five consecutive word" plagiarism rule? Ask Question. Asked 8 years, 7 months ago. Active 2 years ago. Viewed 69k times. Improve this question.

Craig Sefton Tom Au Tom Au 4, 3 3 gold badges 16 16 silver badges 37 37 bronze badges. Five consecutive words of original, creative expression - an original creation of the author you're "plagiarizing". If it's not their own original creation, the status of the original comes into play - plagiarizing a plagiarist is plagiarizing the original, but if the original is a part of the public culture, it can't be plagiarized, not once and not twice.

My observation, from the perspective of one who was affiliated with a college before I retired, is that "plagiarism rules" are developed by faculty members who cannot stand each other, who object to the opinions of others, and who don't like the students either. So, "Person XYZ plagiarizes" is just a way to avoid saying what they really feel about each other. Yes, Five consecutive word should not be a part of others. But some plagiarism checker not following plagiarism rule to detect this.

Do you have any reference source about this "five words rule"? I have never heard about it, and it would help to know the context it comes from. Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. I think that I will was the first time that Britain, France, Germany, and Italy all men, women, and children March 1 of this year turn left at the traffic light that's six!

Improve this answer. Community Bot 1. Jay Jay I would think those phases would just be an homage — Andrey. Andrey Rules against plagiarism don't say that you can't copy someone else's words. They say that you can't copy someone else's words without giving proper credit. If you wrote in an academic paper that you had this brilliant new philosophical argument, "I think, therefore I am", that would not only be plagiarism but very lame plagiarism. But you could certainly write, "As Descartes wrote, 'I think, therefore I am.

Mark Jackson Mark Jackson 71 1 1 silver badge 1 1 bronze badge. And yet somehow the definition of plagiarism has become confused with the configuration of software wholly inadequate for its purported task of detecting plagiarism.

You cannot plagiarize an idea. Your example is plagiarism. In that they didn't do anything but use the original writing reworded slightly.

But ideas themselves cannot be plagiarized. Paraphrasing and Plagiarism: What the writing guides say. Although virtually all professional and student writing guides, including those in the sciences, provide specific instructions on the proper use of quotes, references, etc.

That is, these guides often suggest that when paraphrasing, an author must substantially modify the original material. Consider the following examples of paraphrasing guidelines:. Express your own thoughts in your own words…. For example, "Italian Renaissance Art" and "Italian Renissance painting and sculpture" are common phrases and it's hard to find a graceful alternatives.

If, however, you find an unusually good or clever phrase that you'd like to re-use in your paper , then you must acknowledge the author, usually with a footnote.

See When and How to use a Quotation and Barnet's discussion of the use of quotations and avoiding plagiarism on pages - of the 11th edition of A Short Guide to Writing About Art. Some students get into trouble by quoting three or four words without quotation marks, putting in a bridge of a few of their own words, and then a another short quoted phrase without quotation marks, another bridge of their own words, etc. This is a form of plagiarism because it is editing a paragraph by someone else, retaining the structure and much of the text--yet presenting it as their own work.

This includes using an image of a work of art a secondary source while claiming to have examined the art work in person a primary source.

On the surface, false documentation might seem like a clever game: produce the required footnotes without the necessary work--and sit back and laugh.